Elections & Democracy · Live

Should election prediction markets be legal in the United States?

53 votes 9 days ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

A federal appeals court in 2024 allowed Kalshi to offer contracts on which party controls Congress after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission tried to block them.

Volume on U.S. election-related contracts exceeded $3.7 billion on Polymarket alone during the 2024 presidential cycle, according to industry data cited by Reuters.

Supporters argue prediction markets aggregate information faster and more accurately than polls; critics argue they create financial incentives for manipulation of campaigns and voters.

The CFTC has historically opposed event contracts tied to elections, citing concerns about election integrity and the difficulty of policing insider trading across thousands of races.

Unlike securities markets, prediction markets lack a uniform federal insider-trading statute, leaving enforcement to contract terms and CFTC anti-manipulation rules.

Cast your vote
Should election prediction markets be legal in the United States?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — legalize and regulate them like other financial markets0%
Yes — but only with strict insider-trading and position-size limits0%
No — limit them to small-scale academic or research use0%
No — ban betting on U.S. elections entirely0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters agree with you.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Not enough votes yet to show state-level results — check back as more people vote.
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters agree with you.
Yes — legalize and regulate them like other financial markets0%
Yes — but only with strict insider-trading and position-size limits0%
No — limit them to small-scale academic or research use0%
No — ban betting on U.S. elections entirely0%