Gerrymandered maps can determine the partisan outcome of House and state-legislature races for a decade at a time.
Gerrymandering is when map-drawers shape districts to lock in election outcomes before voters cast a single ballot.
Voters can find themselves split across districts in ways that dilute the impact of their community’s vote.
Whichever party controls redistricting in a state often controls the next ten years of its congressional delegation.
Spreading the other side's voters thinly across many districts so they fall short of a majority in each one.
Concentrating the other side's voters into a few districts they win overwhelmingly, wasting their surplus votes.
Repeating the process after each census, locking in the advantage for a decade at a time.
A look at how the Voting Rights Act, the Equal Protection Clause, and the redistricting process intersect when courts review congressional maps.
Read the guide →A renewed Supreme Court fight over Alabama's congressional map has revived a decades-old debate over when race may, or must, shape district lines.
Read the brief →Do you believe voter fraud affects election outcomes?
Americans remain divided over whether illegal voting alters who wins elections, even as studies and officials report few documented cases.
Judicial review is the power American courts use to decide whether a law or government action violates the Constitution.
Cloture is the only formal way to end a Senate filibuster — get 60 senators to vote to close debate, and the bill moves to a vote.