PresidentialSurvey.com Logo
Domestic Policy
237 voting nowDemo data
Trending fast

Should Congress restrict the sale of Americans' location data by commercial data brokers?

0 votes 1 day ago 52/28 splitDemo data
The facts

The Pentagon has acknowledged reports that U.S. military personnel are being targeted by foreign actors using commercially available location data, according to Reuters reporting published in May 2026.

The U.S. data broker industry generates an estimated $200 billion in annual revenue, with hundreds of firms aggregating and reselling consumer location, browsing, and purchase data.

There is no comprehensive federal law specifically regulating the sale of location data; protections exist in sector-specific statutes such as HIPAA and in state laws including the California Consumer Privacy Act.

Supporters of restrictions argue that adversaries can purchase commercial data to identify service members, intelligence officers, and sensitive facilities; opponents argue that broad bans could hamper legitimate advertising, navigation, and emergency-services industries.

The Fourth Amendment is Not For Sale Act, which would bar federal agencies from purchasing data they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain, passed the House in 2024 but has not become law.

Cast your vote
Should Congress restrict the sale of Americans' location data by commercial data brokers?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — ban the sale of precise location data outright0%
Yes — but allow sales with explicit consumer opt-in consent0%
No — but require stronger disclosure and security standards0%
No — let the existing market and self-regulation continue0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Demo data
Once geographic aggregates ship, this section shows your state and the most dramatic agreement/disagreement around the country.
Virginia
55% Yes
Your state
Florida
51% No
leans opposite
Pennsylvania
53% Yes
close split
Michigan
57% Yes
strongest shift
Texas
54% No
disagrees
Georgia
50% Yes
nearly tied
Northeast
58% Yes
South
47% Yes
Midwest
54% Yes
West
61% Yes
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Live shifts
Demo data
Updating live
YES gained 4% nationally in the last hour as new votes surged from the Northeast.
1 hr
Florida flipped toward NO after trending narrowly YES earlier this afternoon.
18 min
1,248 new votes were submitted in the last 10 minutes.
Live
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Yes — ban the sale of precise location data outright0%
Yes — but allow sales with explicit consumer opt-in consent0%
No — but require stronger disclosure and security standards0%
No — let the existing market and self-regulation continue0%

More context

A Reuters report citing the Pentagon says U.S. military personnel are being targeted by foreign actors using location data sourced from the commercial data-broker market. The disclosure has renewed a long-running debate over whether Congress should regulate the buying and selling of granular location information collected by apps, advertisers, and telecom intermediaries.

Supporters of new restrictions argue the case for federal action is now a national-security question, not only a privacy question. Commercial data sets routinely include device identifiers tied to specific GPS coordinates updated multiple times per hour. Researchers have demonstrated that such data can be used to identify individual service members traveling to classified sites, intelligence officers under cover, and federal judges. Proponents say a targeted ban on the sale of precise location data, or a strict opt-in consent regime, would close a channel that foreign intelligence services can access for the price of a marketing contract.

Opponents of new restrictions argue that location data underpins a substantial part of the modern digital economy, including navigation, ride-hailing, weather, emergency response, and advertising-supported free apps. They warn that broad federal bans could entrench the largest platforms, which collect data first-party, while shutting down smaller competitors that depend on third-party sources. Some also argue that targeted security measures — operational-security training, device-level controls, and narrow rules for sensitive populations — can address the military-targeting risk without restructuring the broader market.

The empirical questions are genuinely contested: how much of the targeting risk would a sales ban actually eliminate, given that hostile actors can also acquire data through breaches and overseas brokers, and how much economic activity depends on the practices that would be restricted. Several narrower bills, including the Fourth Amendment is Not For Sale Act, remain pending in Congress.